The EU governments feel that weaken their control over their own borders. The natural reaction is t

Political powers Cotroceni Steering Parliament Affairs Foreign Policy Political ni Parties Corruption, suspected cases NATO military matters Secret services Republic of Moldova Human Rights elections Gypsies / Roma Churches of Hungary on Dual Citizenship / Hungary Hungary Hungarian Hungarian-Romanian Minorities Act Regions autonomy restitution ni Magyarverések National holidays chiang Carpathian Basin Panorama Economy Financial Investments ni in Energy ni Infrastructure Tourism Agricultural Wages, Labor Social - Health Environment Rosia Montana, cyan EU European Commission European Parliament Hungarian organizations Transylvanian Hungarian People's Party - EMNP Hungarian Civic Party - MPP Romanian Hungarian ni Democratic Alliance - DAHR Education and Science Higher Education Education ni Education Film, Photo Media Literature Theatre Music, Dance Art History Műemlékvédelem live past Securitate XX. eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. centuries Municipal Elections European Middle Ages Ancient Hungarian Parliament Parliamentary party Presidential Elections
Filed Under self-determination, Banat, Codru Vrabie, annexation, EPAS, European Parliament, European Union, integration, Ioana Lupe, corruption, Kosovo, Crimea, Crimean Tatars, Hungarians and Romanians and referendum, Oltenia, Russia and the Ukraine, Russia, regions , Romanian, Russian, Scotland, Laszlo Tokes, Ukraine, Vasile reach out, crisis, Victor Ponta
Loss of the Crimean peninsula of Ukraine in Moscow raised other concerns about the autonomous efforts ni of expansion over the range with the neighboring states. Lupe Ioana Vasile writers reach out and Codru Vrabievel, the President talked EPAS implications of this crisis.
In some surprised reactions, including Moise Gurana well. Patient Finds specific text in some mellettivé or invert declared, especially when politics are involved. We have to be somewhat quiet, we're in the EU and NATO.
I think Ukraine for the best Finnish model, ie a model which allows her flexibility. Risks involved in any experiment, which only model they wanted to force Ukraine and guides the way for what happened.
Russia is not only engaged in propaganda - although we know that quite a lot. But to say that only carries ni Moscow propaganda means that we do not understand what is happening in this world. Everyone is engaged in propaganda.
This theory is a tool. But Russia has lost the propaganda war against the West. However, Moscow's former sphere of power and influence in the territory retained. However, the West uses a universally accepted otherwise received by the public language.
Russia as a bargaining tool to use propaganda - to the fore push people ni like Zsirinovszkij whose discourse is scare and then negotiate with the West, who seems to be more rational. Virtually forward hitting the "fool" behind him and pulls the other.
I tried to imagine myself in a position Crimean citizens who are confronted ni with a referendum butikoséba in a block of flats at the corner of Simferopol. I do not think that the EU is also a reference to the four great freedoms. The people with the fear of instability is devoted ni to the well-known things - past, history ni ... and they are all tied to Russia.
The balance of power is the number one rule is to stop the stronger side, so they pass the conflict, leaving stress behind. If you're the weaker side, then you will fajulni ni bloody conflict.
The four freedoms of the EU has implemented an unprecedented thing: deliberately weaken the boundaries. When a state like Romania needs to be represented in the Parliament of the Diaspora, ni then waking up to the fact that some things have changed.
The EU governments feel that weaken their control over their own borders. The natural reaction is to represent it even harder, this is their local, regional - and thus appear in the szuverenitáspárti discourse, with the Russians malmára folded in the water.
It is very likely that it is worth the time when the EU 28 central government ceases to take place in the region of 270 - for example, Oltenia, Banat, the 16 or so range in Germany. If we move in this direction, then why not give a chance to the Crimea, to decide the fate?
It was pretty vile proposed plan for the Eastern European region. ni The Ukrainian financial elite first sensed this and say NO to the EU agreements. It was the will of reaction. The future of the pro-Europe, people were loyal to the central element - in this respect, there is no doubt. The people ni were very disappointed, the Yanukovich government took the country to the edge of bankruptcy. But we wait to see what happens in the new power, which seems to me to be very weak, but has the support of the West.
In this intermediary role throughout the crisis, Poland